Which of the following is true regarding physician reimbursement methods?

The statement about RBRVS becoming more commonly adopted in recent years holds true because the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) was developed to create a more equitable payment system for physicians. It takes into account the resources required to provide medical services and assigns a value to each service based on its complexity and requirements. This approach allows for reimbursement to be based on the clinical work and overhead costs associated with each procedure, making it a preferred method for many insurance plans and Medicare over time.

The growth of RBRVS can be attributed to its structured methodology and the increasing demand for a more standardized reimbursement framework that reflects the actual costs of delivering care. As healthcare systems strive for efficiency and fairness, more plans have recognized the benefits of adopting RBRVS, leading to its wider usage among various payers.

In contrast, the other options present inaccuracies about the physician reimbursement landscape. The notion that all plans use the UCR (Usual, Customary, and Reasonable) method exclusively is misleading, as many plans adopt various models, including RBRVS and capitated rates. The claim that capitated rates are no longer used by any plans overlooks their continued use in certain managed care settings, and stating that only Blue Shield employs the RBRVS